Michael Thomas wrote: > On the requirement for HAO in all IPv6 nodes... is > this actually necessary? That is, if I do not > implement a binding cache (which is not a > requirment), the only processing the node would > need to do is inform the mobile node that it can > not/will not process the HAO because it's not > legal to interpret it as a home address without a > binding entry. Likewise, a MN shouldn't be sending > a HAO until it establishes a binding, thus there > shouldn't be a possibility for missynchronization > there either.
Right. And that's what we are recommending. We are saying that the current HAO requirement for all nodes should be removed. CN has no clue about HAO, MN sends anyway => ICMP Par.prob. code 2 MN tries to establish RO, no CN support => ICMP Par.prob. code 1 Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
