> It is possible that we could do a combined version of these > two choices: > > - The IPv6 WG does the minimal updates to make the > current IPv4 MIBs version-independent. > - State-of-the-art MIBs are developed in other areas > and groups, as appropriate. > > What do you folks think?
I agree with this proposal. The existing work of the IPv6 MIB Design team should be targeted towards making the minimal updates. State-of-the-art MIBs should be undertaken by subject matter experts. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
