Robert Elz wrote: > > The only thing to be aware of, is that we (IPv6) must avoid getting upset > if we do lots of work to update some particular MIB, and then just before > we're finished, a new better version emerges from elsewhere (which is > intended to deprecate some current v4 only MIB). If that happens, we > should just junk whatever we have done, and accept the newer one.
As long as the newer, better version supports IPv6. We do have the responsibility of ensuring v6 support in the new MIBs. As a note, the IPv6 MIB Design Team has been reviewing new MIBs that come out to make sure they are using the INET Address TC where appropriate. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
