> I'm not sure that we are loosening that. The rest of the quoted
> paragraph reads:
>
> "If a host has already performed
> a random delay since the interface became (re)enabled (e.g., as part
> of Duplicate Address Detection [ADDRCONF]) there is no need to delay
> again before sending the first Router Solicitation message."
>
> I took the paragraph as meaning that the RS should be delayed when the
> host first comes up to avoid synchronization with other devices after
> some abnormal event, but that movement is part of normal operation, not
> expected to be synchronized with other hosts and so the delay is not
> required. Any thoughts?
>
Agree.
jak
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
