> > I'm not sure that we are loosening that. The rest of the quoted > > paragraph reads: > > > > "If a host has already performed > > a random delay since the interface became (re)enabled (e.g., as part > > of Duplicate Address Detection [ADDRCONF]) there is no need to delay > > again before sending the first Router Solicitation message." > > > > I took the paragraph as meaning that the RS should be delayed when the > > host first comes up to avoid synchronization with other devices after > > some abnormal event, but that movement is part of normal operation, not > > expected to be synchronized with other hosts and so the delay is not > > required. Any thoughts?
Sometimes handovers can also be synchronized (to some extent) among a set of mobile nodes, for example when they are traveling in the same transportation vehicle. alper -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
