On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> 
> > The thing is, it seems like this (IMO relatively complex) iterative
> > comparison algorithm must be run for every outbound packet (one might be
> > able to optimize a bit with connection-oriented protocols).
> 
> I think connection oriented protocols effectively require that
> the source address (or addresses in the case of SCTP) be selected
> when the connection is created. Thus trying to do this for every packet
> would be the wrong thing in that case.

Agreed.

[...]
 
> > An alternative seems to be to implement some form of (unspecified --
> > caching is only discussed in the context of dst address selection)
> > optimizations.  One example of optimization could be putting the
> > to-be-used source address in the routing table, and refresh it always when
> > rtable or any address of the node changes or changes state
> > (deprecated/preferred, home address etc.), but these might have their own
> > problems.
> > 
> > My worry is, is it useful to specify a mechanism for selection default
> > addresses that can't really be used without critical optimizations?
> 
> I'm not worried about this. We have exactly the same issue for routing table
> lookup in hosts and routers; there is no specification that states how
> to implement caching schemes.

We haven't really specified the source address selection like this for 
IPv4 either, I believe.  Have I missed something?

Routing table lookup is very simple compared to this I think.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to