On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] 神明達哉 wrote:
> IMO, it is not necessarily a problem that nobody bothered.  I've not
> bothered (though I've made some comments on the draft) about the
> complexity because I didn't think it was a problem of the document
> based on my experiences on implementing and operating with the
> specification.

It surely isn't a problem that John Doe Network User is likely to face, I 
agree -- the algorithm is not _that_ complex.
 
> Please let me explain my own environments.  My laptop usually has
> quite a large number of addresses, and the property of the addresses
> varies much; it has 12 (unicast) addresses as of writing this,
> including the loopback, link-local, site-local, and global ones.  It
> also has temporary addresses for privacy extension, and some of the
> temporary addresses are often deprecated due to the short lifetimes.
> (note: the number "12" will be much increased in a few days.  I
> rebooted my laptop last night, so it has only one temporary address
> for each autoconfigured prefix.  More and more new temporary addresses
> will come.)
>
> A few days ago, I checked statistics on the source address selection
> on the laptop.  By then it had been running for 6.5 days.  According
> to the statistics, about 76.8% of the pair-wise address comparisons
> had been broken by the rule 2 (Prefer appropriate scope) and the rule
> 3 (Avoid deprecated addresses).  IMO, the rules 1-3 are quite simple
> and light, and do not affect the performance much.

The problems are likely to be seen with high use of UDP/ICMP, e.g. 
sending a Gigabit/FastEthernet full of UDP and checking how much that 
affects performance.
 
> As a result, I don't think it is necessary to require (either SHOULD
> or MUST) caching in the address selection draft.  I don't oppose to
> mentioning the fact that caching may improve the performance, though.

I don't think we should require anything: if an implementation wants to do 
it the simple way, that's fine.  But I believe there should be some more 
statements in the Implementation Considerations section, at least.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to