Yes, sorry.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Daley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Brett Pentland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thomas Narten"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Changing RS Reply Timing for Mobile IPv6
>
> Hi James,
>
> I guess you mean draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-01.txt ?
>
> Greg Daley
>
> jak wrote:
> > So the deployment alternative with ND as defined in RFC 2461 and the base
FMIPv6
> > document if one wants faster 802.11 handovers is to set
> > MAX_RTR_SOLICITATION_DELAY to zero and set MAX_RA_DELAY_TIME to zero. Near
term,
> > this is likely to be what people do. With this deployment, not only could
the
> > above two problems with congestion occur, but the router is now subject to
DoS
> > attacks. The advantage of the proposal in draft-khalil-ipng-fastra-00.txt is
> > that the authors believe it would reduce the potential for DoS attacks.
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
