Sounds right to me. Margaret
At 07:19 AM 10/27/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, Issue 7 is: 7) Sub-IP layers (IP over Foo) - should all be included, or just one or two? Brian Haberman said: Given that new layer-2 technologies will appear and future docs may/will define how IPv6 runs over those layers, I would suggest using generic text that says that if a vendor wants to support IPv6 over a particular L2, then they must implement the IPv6-over-foo spec for that L2. Then I would give a few examples (IPv6-over-ethernet, etc.). I agree, what does the list think? John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
