I agree with this. Adam Machalek
<john.loughney@nokia.
com> To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: cc:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Node Requirements Issue 7
ng.sun.com>
10/27/2002 06:19 AM
Hi all,
Issue 7 is:
7) Sub-IP layers (IP over Foo) - should all be included, or just one or
two?
Brian Haberman said:
Given that new layer-2 technologies will appear and future docs may/will
define how IPv6 runs over those layers, I would suggest using generic
text that says that if a vendor wants to support IPv6 over a particular
L2, then they must implement the IPv6-over-foo spec for that L2. Then
I would give a few examples (IPv6-over-ethernet, etc.).
I agree, what does the list think?
John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
