At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:52:14 -0500 (EST), Dan Lanciani wrote: > > Any language that reduces site-local addresses to second-class citizens (or, > worse, implies that they should not be used concurrent with global addresses) > will give stack and application vendors an excuse to fail to support such > configurations. I don't think you want to open such a huge can of worms as > it will entail revisiting every problem that has been ``resolved'' with an > admonition to simply use site-local addresses.
If site-local was the answer, what were the questions? (No joke intended) Do you have a list? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
