I'm working on it... :-) Seriously, we have an opportunity, with the introduction of IPv6, to advocate new ways of doing things on the new network.
Just because people have been doing something one (bad) way in the past, doesn't mean that we should advocate that approach in IPv6. Margaret At 05:45 PM 10/28/02, Michel Py wrote:
> Alain Durand wrote: > Oh... the old argument that NAT/private address > brings security... Go tell that to people that write requirements, especially the ones that work for the government, and when you have convinced them get back to us, ok? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
