>
> > => I certainly didn't mean to suggest that the IETF
> > has an enforcement authority. I meant that this words
> > are used in cases where: if not followed, the protocol
> > will break. Therefore people generally follow them.
>
> if SLs are used in an environment where applications communicate
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> across scope boundaries,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=> In other words, be careful how you use it. That's not
a reason to deprecate the use of site-locals altogether.
Hesham
PS: I hope that a fundamental RFC like addrarch will be
available soon!! If we keep this infinite loop going
people will use 2373 and we'll end up in a lose lose situation.
reasonably-written applications (including
> apps using standard protocols) will break.
>
> therefore MUST/MUST NOT restrictions seem appropriate.
>
> Keith
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
