On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > >PS: I hope that a fundamental RFC like addrarch will be > >available soon!! If we keep this infinite loop going > >people will use 2373 and we'll end up in a lose lose situation. > > This discussion should have no affect on the publication of > the addr arch RFC, which is currently in the IESG awaiting > approval for publication as a Draft Standard.
No, I don't think so -- there's at least one point you missed, consider e.g.: 2.5.6 Local-Use IPv6 Unicast Addresses Routers must not forward any packets with site-local source or destination addresses outside of the site. This conflicts with the "treat as globals" stance. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
