On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Michel Py wrote: > >> Michel Py wrote: > >> Then what was all this noise about restricting SLs to > >> non-connected networks? This *is* a connected network. > > > Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > Because, I have been suggesting that we _change_ the > > scoped addressing architecture rules to restrict the > > use of site-locals to non-connected networks. > > You can certainly write a draft about it, but how many more hundreds of > posts on the mailing list does it take in order for you to understand > that modifying the scoped addressing architecture on that topic will not > reach consensus?
I don't think this is productive. Btw. I believe the rough consensus is the other way around. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
