Tim Chown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Markku Savela wrote:
> >
> > Why should it be a problem?
> >
> > - it seems that it would be advantageous for nodes within the site to
> > use sitelocals whenever possible, especially if your global
> > connection is via flaky connection.
>
> Indeed, but this is the dilemma between preference for globals to avoid the
> site-local scoping "headaches" and preference for site-locals for connection
> persistence during renumbering or (dis)connectivity events.
Er, but I use global addresses every day on good ol' IPv4, within my
employer's internal network, and they work just fine when external
connectivity is broken. I see no advantage in local addresses here.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
