OK folks I am counting and I see clear majority for margarets proposal? /jim [In matters of style, swim with the currents....in matters of principle, stand like a rock. - Thomas Jefferson]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alain Durand [mailto:Alain.Durand@;Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Brian E Carpenter > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Proposal for site-local clean-up > > > > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > >Unfortunately it's too late to catch the addressing architecture > >document unless we recall it from the RFC Editor and cycle > it through > >the IESG again. But I propose that we do exactly that, in order to > >change the following paragraph in section 2.5.6: > > > [...] > > >Alternatively, we could spend the next 5 years discussing the > >unnecessary complexities of using site-locals on connected sites. > > > > Brian > > > > As I would like to see IPv6 deployed in my lifetime, > I support proposal like this one that makes life simpler. > > It's time to move on, unless the volume of discussion/rat > holing on this topic will really become a DOS attack on the > mailling list, or worse, on IPv6 itself. > > - Alain. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
