Hello Erik, I have a minor comment on your note, without taking away from its main thrust.
Erik Nordmark wrote: > Since mobile nodes typically don't know the "range" of their mobility > up front, this seems to lead to a desire to have a mobile node use site-local > addresses when in its home site and not have that communication fail when > the node moves outside its home site. (If this isn't provided the result > would probably be that all mobile nodes will only be configured with global > addresses.) It should be possible for a mobile node to use a site-local prefix as long as it only ever roams within the site. This seems to go along with the proposal that site-local prefixes should only be used in domains that are disconnected from the Internet. If a mobile node has a global home address, it should use that global address all the time, I reckon. Otherwise, if it only has a site-local address, then by definition it is only addressable at that site. Users of such equipment should be made aware of that limitation. Regards, Charlie P. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
