> there's a set of cases where the MN uses Localized mobility management > such as HMIPv6 and can use only site locals within a set of access > networks.
> I'm not sure if this is complete, but I don't see it's that > problematic. Which problem are you trying to solve here to which the solution is to use site local addresses? I don't see why using site local addresses in the context of local mobility has any benefits, but perhaps I'm missing something. The cases when site-local addresses don't offer any benefits and they don't cause any additional complexity or problems are not interesting to discuss since it doesn't help folks understand the tradeoffs between different levels of support for site-locals. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
