From: Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Comments on prefix delegation requirements Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:46:24 +0100 (CET)
> > I think these are just editorial nits. > > The draft talks about "commercial" but I think the same issues are present > if there is a non-commercial ISP that wants to offer non-commercial IPv6 > service. So in terms of describing the need for the technology it is probably > best to drop the "commercial" designation. > > Similarely, the statement about "boost IPv6 business quick as possible." > might also distract from the technical content of the document. > > The document talks about "RA (Router Avertisement)". It would be good to > add a reference to the proxy RA document (as "work in progress") > to make the reference explicit. > > I see some spelling errors like "signle. thanks! I will take those comments to update. Shin -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
