On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Erik Nordmark wrote: > The draft talks about "commercial" but I think the same issues are present > if there is a non-commercial ISP that wants to offer non-commercial IPv6 > service. So in terms of describing the need for the technology it is probably > best to drop the "commercial" designation.
Speaking of which, and the comment on security in the IETF meeting, I believe it is a perfectly fine usage scenario to run prefix delegation over shared ethernet (think of e.g. student dorm networks, usually based on switched, shared ethernet). -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
