Charlie, > I am particularly concerned that we have a Mobile IPv6 specification > that, when implemented, gives sensible results. Eliminating the possibility > for having faster router advertisements does not give sensible > results.
Noone is arguing that the possibility for having faster RA should be eliminated, at least as far as I know. It is not, IMO, critical that these changes be in the same document as the base MIPv6 spec. What is important that these ND changes become an RFC within a reasonable amount of time, so that those that implement MIPv6 also pick up the ND changes in the same general time frame. I see no reason why this can't happen within 6 months. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
