Hello Erik, No one should fear making the technology better. However, having a specification that gives sensible results does not in any way impede that effort. If Mobile IPv6 specifies something, that something can be taken in to account in any future specification. I can't see how it would possibly take away anything from the future to have things working sensibly in the present time.
Regards, Charlie P. Erik Nordmark wrote: > > I am particularly concerned that we have a Mobile IPv6 specification > > that, when implemented, gives sensible results. Eliminating the possibility > > for having faster router advertisements does not give sensible results. > > I don't want to eliminate it - I want to make it better. > But the fear of trying to make it better will further delay the MIPv6 > specification makes me not want to bring up those issues. > > Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
