Erik Nordmark wrote: > > One part of the problem I see is that your last sentence above doesn't > appear in the draft. Getting the applicability of the frequent unsolicited > RAs stated is important. > Doing this in a short separate draft doesn't have to delay the mipv6 > spec, but working out the text before the mipv6 spec get last called > will add delay as far as I can tell.
Hi Erik, the applicability of frequent RAs can be specified in 1 sentence. "if you have a bandwidth constrained link, dont depend on frequent RAs for movement detection". do we need a separate spec for this? Vijay -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
