On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > By burying the solution for this into the MIP spec, it > > removes the possibility that wider IPv6 nodes can benefit. > > I don't think we should bury it in the MIP spec, but first > address it in the MIPv6 spec then take that & move it into a > 2461-bis draft.
I don't think waiting for 2461-bis is the right approach, rather a draft pushed through in mobileip wg. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
