Richard,

> Richard Nelson wrote:
> It would be really nice if the "not globally routable"
> property was by some mechanism stronger than blocked by
> decree.  AFter all we no that RFC1918 addresses do get
> routed sometimes by mistake, but you can't route back
> to them because of the ambiguity.

Agree.

 
>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Bob Hinden and I have contributed some interesting
>> suggestions about this earlier, but they were lost
>> in the email volume.

> Richard Nelson wrote:
> Yes they got lost in the volume. Please repeat them
> on this thread.

Just did see two other messages with the same subject.

Michel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to