ipng  

Messages by Date

• 2002/11/27 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/27 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/27 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
• 2002/11/27 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/27 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
• 2002/11/27 RE: short circuiting reverse lookups (resend) Jeroen Massar
• 2002/11/27 Re: globally unique site local addresses Brian E Carpenter
• 2002/11/27 Re: globally unique site local addresses Brian E Carpenter
• 2002/11/26 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 short circuiting reverse lookups (resend) Aidan Williams
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back Andrew White
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Mohan Parthasarathy
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michael Thomas
• 2002/11/26 RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Mark . Andrews
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michael Thomas
• 2002/11/26 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Charles E. Perkins
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Charles E. Perkins
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Michael Thomas
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: a different approach to site-local's "security" Richard Draves
• 2002/11/26 Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/26 RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/26 Re: globally unique site local addresses Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 RE: one question... Michel Py
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/26 I-D ACTION:draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/26 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Tim Chown
• 2002/11/26 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: globally unique site local addresses Brian E Carpenter
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Brian E Carpenter
• 2002/11/26 Re: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/26 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/26 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/26 Re: short circuiting reverse lookups Robert Elz
• 2002/11/25 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Andrew White
• 2002/11/25 Re: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/25 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 confusing term. Soohong Daniel Park
• 2002/11/25 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: short circuiting reverse lookups itojun
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• 2002/11/25 RE: one question... Mark Smith
• 2002/11/25 RE: one question... Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? itojun
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: one question... Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/25 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Tim Chown
• 2002/11/25 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Tim Chown
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Tim Chown
• 2002/11/25 one question... Michael Thomas
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Mark . Andrews
• 2002/11/25 Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Ole Troan
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 RE: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 RE: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 a different approach to site-local's "security" Steve Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2002/11/25 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Keith Moore
• 2002/11/25 even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Charles E. Perkins
• 2002/11/25 RE: Summary & some possible long term consequences of GUPI prefixes Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Charles E. Perkins
• 2002/11/25 RE: Prefix delegation status NOISETTE Yoann FTRD/DMI/CAE
• 2002/11/25 RE: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/25 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 Re: Prefix delegation status Ole Troan
• 2002/11/25 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Charlie Perkins
• 2002/11/25 Re: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Steven Blake
• 2002/11/25 Prefix delegation status NOISETTE Yoann FTRD/DMI/CAE
• 2002/11/25 I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-ipaddressassign-05.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2002/11/25 Re: Summary & some possible long term consequences of GUPI prefixes Brian E Carpenter
• 2002/11/25 Summary & some possible long term consequences of GUPI prefixes Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/25 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/25 Re: globally unique site local addresses Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/24 RE: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Samita Chakrabarti
• 2002/11/24 Re: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Samita Chakrabarti
• 2002/11/24 Re: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Keith Moore
• 2002/11/24 RE: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/24 RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-01.txt Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/24 Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Samita Chakrabarti
• 2002/11/24 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/24 Re: globally unique site local addresses Jari Arkko
• 2002/11/24 Re: globally unique site local addresses Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/24 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/24 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/24 Re: globally unique site local addresses Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/24 Re: globally unique site local addresses Pekka Nikander
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses john . loughney
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses Mika Liljeberg
• 2002/11/24 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/24 RE: globally unique site local addresses Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 RE: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/23 RE: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/23 RE: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/23 RE: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/23 RE: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Bound, Jim
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Dan Lanciani
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 Re: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Margaret Wasserman
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Mika Liljeberg
• 2002/11/23 RE: Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/23 Enforcing unreachability of site local addresses Christian Huitema
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Mika Liljeberg
• 2002/11/23 Re: globally unique site local addresses Jari Arkko
• 2002/11/22 RE: globally unique site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/22 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/22 Re: Globally unique site-locals was [repost] A few comments onSite-Local Useage Pekka Savola
• 2002/11/21 Re: Globally unique site-locals was [repost] A few comments onSite-Local Useage Mark Smith
• 2002/11/21 RE: globally unique site local addresses Mark Smith
• 2002/11/21 Globally unique site-locals was [repost] A few comments on Site-Local Useage Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 Globally unique site-locals was [repost] A few comments on Site-Local Useage Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 Globally unique site-locals was [repost] A few comments on Site-Local Useage Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 RE: globally unique site local addresses Dan Lanciani
• 2002/11/21 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 RE: "unique enough" [RE: globally unique site local addresses] Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 RE: globally unique site local addresses Michel Py
• 2002/11/21 Re: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Francis Dupont
• 2002/11/21 Re: MIPv6 and ND value changes Charlie Perkins
• 2002/11/21 Re: [mobile-ip] Re: Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Alper E. YEGIN

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]