I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what we are trying to accomplish
with this email discussion. From my, probably simplistic, view we are
missing a fundamental construct of IPv6 addresses. That construct is that
v6 address have some kind of scope attached to them. That scope is meant
to limit how far they can reach or where they can be used. Am I
understanding the v6 address architecture correctly?
I think we all agree that there are Link Local (LL) addresses which can
only be used for communications between nodes on a single link, i.e.,
completely non-routable.
There are also Global addresses which provide a globally unique IPv6
address to an Internet node. These addresses may be routed anywhere on the
global Internet. Note: administrative filtering and address blocking may
prevent Internet nodes from establishing an end-to-end connection.
In between these 2 extremes (LL and Global) there is a range of other
scopes. Margaret pointed out some of these including different divisions
in a single organization or manufacture/supplier relationships. The Site
Local (SL) address was suppose to enable these types of relationships.
The talk of GUPI addresses doesn't seem to capture this limited scope
function. Am I missing something?
From my perspective the base address document should make this idea of
multiple scopes very clear.
We certainly have a good handle on what a global address should do, and the
LL addresses are also well defined. The trouble is that we never had SL's
before and the concept of a 'site' is ambiguous so its hard to figure out
what to do with them. Since we don't have any operational experience with
these limited scope addresses, we should leave the documentation of them to
the future when this experience is gained.
Rich
------------------------------------
Richard A. Carlson e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Research Section phone: (630) 252-7289
Argonne National Laboratory fax: (630) 252-4021
9700 Cass Ave. S.
Argonne, IL 60439
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: one question... Keith Moore
- Re: one question... Mark Smith
- Re: one question... Keith Moore
- Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
- Re: one question... Mark Smith
- Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question.... Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Keith Moore
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Mark Smith
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Pekka Savola
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Michael Thomas
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Richard Carlson
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Keith Moore
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Erik Nordmark
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Ronald van der Pol
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Keith Moore
- Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one q... Keith Moore
- Re: one question... Keith Moore
- Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
