ipng  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: DAD for stateful address autoconfig itojun
  • RE: DAD for stateful address autoconfig Soohong Daniel Park
  • Re: DAD for stateful address autoconfig Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
  • Re: DAD for stateful address autoconfig Thomas Narten
• 6over4 sipa
• [no subject] aridaman kaushik
  • Re: Margaret Wasserman
• Internet draft on EUIs and site locals Andrew White
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-ipv6-name-auto-reg-00.txt Internet-Drafts
• [no subject] aridaman kaushik
  • Re: Mukesh Gupta
• Retail IPv6 Service in the US? James Kempf
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Ross Finlayson
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bill Manning
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bob Hinden
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bob Hinden
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Jeroen Massar
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Soohong Daniel Park
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Soohong Daniel Park
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Michel Py
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bound, Jim
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bill Manning
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Bound, Jim
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Christian Huitema
  • Re: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? itojun
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Pekka Savola
  • RE: Retail IPv6 Service in the US? Jeroen Massar
• Re: (usagi-users 02021) deepspace6 official announcement YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
• preferred lifetime > valid lifetime JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: preferred lifetime > valid lifetime Thomas Narten
  • Re: preferred lifetime > valid lifetime JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: preferred lifetime > valid lifetime Thomas Narten
• I-D ACTION:draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt by way of Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Alain Durand
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Tim Chown
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Bob Hinden
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Alain Durand
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Mark Smith
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Bob Hinden
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Andrew White
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Keith Moore
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Bob Hinden
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Keith Moore
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Bob Hinden
  • Re: draft-hinden-ipv6-global-site-local-00.txt Brian E Carpenter
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2553bis-09.txt Internet-Drafts
• GUSL / GUPI summary Michel Py
  • Re: GUSL / GUPI summary Pekka Savola
  • Re: GUSL / GUPI summary Keith Moore
  • Re: GUSL / GUPI summary Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: GUSL / GUPI summary Michel Py
  • RE: GUSL / GUPI summary Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: GUSL / GUPI summary Tony Hain
  • Re: GUSL / GUPI summary Keith Moore
  • RE: GUSL / GUPI summary Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: GUSL / GUPI summary Tony Hain
  • Ipv6 Subnet Digambar Rasal
  • Re: Ipv6 Subnet Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: Ipv6 Subnet Jeroen Massar
• RE: EUI-48 globally unique site-locals (GUSL) Michel Py
• TCP MD5 christophe preguica
  • Re: TCP MD5 Francis Dupont
  • Re: TCP MD5 christophe preguica
• Re: [mobile-ip] Proposal for MIPv6 APIs to switch default source address selection Samita Chakrabarti
• test message Rashmi
• The future of connectivity, or how globally unique site locals maybecome almost obsolete. Mark Smith
  • Re: The future of connectivity, or how globally unique site localsmay become almost obsolete. Pekka Nikander
• Feedback requested on GUSL proposal Michel Py
• GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
  • Re: GUSL proposal (very crude) Mark Smith
  • Re: GUSL proposal (very crude) Alan E. Beard
  • Re: GUSL proposal (very crude) Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Mark Smith
  • Re: GUSL proposal (very crude) Brian E Carpenter
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Mark Smith
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Christian Huitema
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
  • RE: GUSL proposal (very crude) Michel Py
• ATTENTION: Use of the ipng mailing list Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman
• test, please ignore Bob Hinden
  • test, please ignore Bob Hinden
  • test, please ignore Bob Hinden
• RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
• RE: Taking two steps back Michel Py
• RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re:onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Keith Moore
  • RE: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Michel Py
• RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Christian Huitema
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Charles E. Perkins
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Pekka Savola
  • Re: assignment of GUPI [RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: onequestion...)] Charles E. Perkins
  • Re: Taking two steps back Andrew White
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michael Thomas
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Mohan Parthasarathy
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) David Borman
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) David Borman
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) george+ipng
  • RE: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michel Py
• I-D ACTION:draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt Internet-Drafts
• confusing term. Soohong Daniel Park
• Re: short circuiting reverse lookups itojun
  • Re: short circuiting reverse lookups Robert Elz
• RE: one question... Christian Huitema
  • RE: one question... Mark Smith
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Mark Smith
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Mark Smith
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Mark Smith
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: one question... Mark Smith
  • Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Mark Smith
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Pekka Savola
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Michael Thomas
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Richard Carlson
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Erik Nordmark
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Ronald van der Pol
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • Re: Taking two steps back (Was: Re: one question...) Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: one question... Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • RE: one question... Michel Py
  • RE: one question... Mark Smith
  • RE: one question... Christian Huitema
  • RE: one question... Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: one question... Michel Py
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • RE: one question... Margaret Wasserman
• a different approach to site-local's "security" Steve Bellovin
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Pekka Savola
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Tim Chown
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Keith Moore
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Erik Nordmark
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Pekka Savola
  • Re: a different approach to site-local's "security" Tim Chown
  • RE: a different approach to site-local's "security" Richard Draves
• even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Ole Troan
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Mark . Andrews
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Pekka Savola
  • one question... Michael Thomas
  • Re: one question... Keith Moore
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: even one reason why provably unique SL is needed? Mark . Andrews

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]