> Keith Moore wrote: > yes, some people will probably try to use GUPIs where PA > globals would be a better choice. eventually, they'll > learn. they'll have to renumber to fix that problem, but > it won't be more difficult than any other kind of IPv6 > renumbering, and we have to solve that problem anyway.
The trouble is that they might elect to use NAT instead of renumbering. I have seen this many times with IPv4. What you propose is taking one problem away (site-locals) and replacing with one even worse (NAT). > I do think that an addressing architecture that > simplifies decision-making would minimize the potential > for delusions. From that perspective, a simple table is > quite attractive: > network not connected to the | PI global addresses > public internet, but | > connected to other IP networks | > via private arrangements | PI global addresses do NOT exist. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
