> > when you get external connectivity and a global prefix and > > realize that you're better off not having to support both the > > global and the GUSL prefixes. so you want to renumber from > > GUSL to global. > > > > No actually, I don't want to renumber from GUSL to global -- > I want both.
you want both. others will want to renumber. > > (e.g. your apps run more reliably, administration is simpler, etc.) > > Ironically, that is exactly why I will keep site-locals running > in parallel with my globals. having SLs (even globally unique ones) in addition to globals causes its own pain. I am not arguing that you shouldn't be able to choose to have your network that way, just that the architecture should make it easy to move from one kind of prefix to another. What would bother me is an architecture that imposed more pain for a site that had started out with a GUSL and needed to transition to globals. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
