In a word: no. We mustn't generate prefixes longer than /48, since
everybody will be designing 16 bit subnet addressing plans. It isn't
acceptable to have different subnet addressing plans with site local
and global prefixes.

  Brian

Andrew White wrote:
> 
> Some thoughts:
> 
> As a method of doing globally unique site local addressing:
> 
> Assuming aggregability is not an issue within a 'site' sized network,
> consider generating site local subnet identifiers at the router, based on
> IEEE EUI-48 identifiers (such as MAC addresses).
> 
> For example, generate as fec0::/12:
> 
> 12 bits: fef
> 48 bits: MAC
>  4 bits: 0 or subnets
> 
> or, if we don't want them in fec0::/10
> 
> 10 bits: fe0
> 48 bits: MAC
>  6 bits: 0 or subnets
> 
> The '0 or subnets' is to allow for the possibility of choosing one EUI-48 on
> a router and using that to allocate all appropriate subnets.
> 
> By piggybacking on the existing registration scheme, we generate "unique"
> site-local subnet ids at the router without needing external registration or
> administration.
> 
> Despite the zero-config nature of this, administration on the router is
> still necessary, both to enable this mode (probably don't want site-local
> behaviour enabled by default) and to determine whether a router is
> authoritative for the link.  An administrator may wish to configure a
> multi-router link with the subnet prefix of only one router.
> 
> An internet-draft describing this in more detail is written and will be
> submitted in the next day or so.  Comments welcome.
> 
> Another comment on uniqueness:
> 
> Under IPv6, even an ambiguous prefix is likely to not resolve to an address
> because of the MAC generated machine id, so the likelihood of collision is
> lower than might be expected from the prefix.
> 
> Final thought:
> 
> Whatever the outcome of the site local discussions, renumbering will remain
> a serious problem under IPv6, that needs to be considered.  Making
> renumbering easier is a hard problem, but a good solution will help reduce a
> variety of other problems.
> 
> --
> Andrew White                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to