Uh? Why would we want both? I think we have way to many address groups already....remember of the voting in Atlanta we had consensus for a limited version of site-locals...not creating a separate address structure?as I recall, we had consensus for limiting site-locals, as well as widespread support for the idea that PI globals were needed.it's not an either-or.
I clearly see a need for PI space or something that would fill that role. I don't see why we can't assign it in the way we are doing today. It will create a routing scaling issue but let's deal with that for what it is.
- kurtis -
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
