I clearly see a need for PI space or something that would fill that role. I don't see why we can't assign it in the way we are doing today. It will create a routing scaling issue but let's deal with that for what it is.
I would like to see us assign PI addresses just like all other global addresses
and route them globally.

However, I don't think that we can responsibly do that and claim that the
route scaling issue is SEP.  Is there any reason to believe that we _can_
actually find a scalable way to route to "portable" PI addresses?

It seems like we may need some consultation/cooperation between the multi6
group and the IPv6 group, to see if we can come up with a full solution to
provide scalable, routable PI addresses.

Margaret



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to