On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michel Py wrote: > 1.1 Limit site-locals to disconnected sites. > Margaret is preparing a draft. > > 1.2 make site-locals unique (remove ambiguity). > Also called GUSL. Two drafts to come: > Bob and Michel+Charlie. > > Non-routability of site-locals could be guaranteed > By the combination of default discards and of course > by the local scope of such addresses. > > In *both* cases, SLs or GUSLs can *not* be routed > outside the site, which means that for inter-site > communications we need GUPIs.
There is no technical reason I can see why inter-site communications couldn't use GUSL's. I would see the necessarity of working around default discards if you want to interconnect two site-local domains as a feature, not a problem. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
