Hi Margaret,

>
>Hi Hiroki,
>
>>Please let me verify two things on draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-00.txt.
>>
>>1. Does [The Impact of Site-Local Addressing in IPv6] try to
>>    prohibit the use of SBR completely?
>
>If the WG chooses to follow the recommendations in this document,
>then SBRs will not longer be necessary.
>
>>2. By the statement,
>>         "IPv6 site-local addresses be limited to use on isolated,
>>         single-site networks.",
>>
>>    are you prohibiting the network below?
>>
>>          Global IPv6 Internet ------- SBR ------ Node with
>>                                                  Global IP and
>>                                                  Site-Local IP
>
>Exactly.  This would not be an isolated, single-site network,
>as it is connected to the global Internet.
>
>>By the way, our SBR is neither research nor test implementation.
>
>Very interesting.  Is this a commercial product, or expected to
>become one?  What routing protocols does it include?  Did you
>experience the problems described in my document?  If so, how
>did you resolve them?

Yes, our SBR routers have been shipped since September, 2000 as
a commercial IPv4/IPv6 dual router.   It supports RIPng, OSPFv3, and
BGP4+.  I have explained our SBR support and routing protocols in this
mailing list once before when the site-local issues were brought up.

We are not supporting BGP4+ w/ SBR, but RIPng and OSPFv3.
RIPng is easy to support as Brian Haberman explained at Atlanta.
For OSPFv3, as you described in I-D, we are allocating separate OSPF
process for each area.  The current OSPFv3 does not consider SBR at all.
This is the reason for separating OSPF processes.

I have not played with SBR with DNS, but DNS related issues seem to be
very tricky.

Thank you,


==== HIROKI ISHIBASHI ==================================================
 3rd Network Systems Development Department, Business Networks Division
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone:  +81-4-7185-7344     Fax:  +81-4-7185-7947
================================================== NEC Corporation =====
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to