On each process, all routing information, including global and site-local are handled. Because of this, a user need to "redistribute" global prefixes (not site-local prefixes) each other. This is the demerit of separating OSPF process per site.
Thanks, Hiroki. I think I understand...
Do you have some type of internal filtering mechanism to decide which routes to "redistribute" from one OSPF process to the others? Or are the OSPF processes using OSPF to speak to each other? Externally, from an OSPF perspective, does your SBR look like a single router? Or like multiple (two in your example) routers with logical links in between them? Thanks, Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
