Michel Py wrote: > > > Erik Nordmark wrote: > > On the enterprise side I can see that folks have been > > bitting or are concerned about renumbering costs if they > > were to use PA addresses. > > > But I don't have any data on how many consider having one > > PA prefix per ISP good enough since it allows some graceful > > cutover when changing ISPs. > > Not many. We have had many contributions that multiple addresses are a > no-go to begin with.
Er, multiple addresses are part of the IPv6 architecture. And SCTP deals with them, even if TCP doesn't. It may be something new and different, but there's no way you can declare it a no-go. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
