Ronald, >> Margaret Wasserman wrote: >> - We need to provide PI addressing in IPv6, or we will >> see wide deployment of IPv6 NAT in enterprises >> and homes. No one seems to be disagreeing with this.
> Ronald van der Pol wrote: > I don't know yet if I agree or not :-) I agree that it > is a good idea to explore the topic of PI addressing. > But if you look at the requirements, it might be better > to take a more fundamental approach and look into the > separatiion of locator and identifier. Right. People don't care much about PI addresses if they have PI identifiers instead. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
