Dan, >> Michel Py wrote: >> One billion routes in the global routing table = does not scale.
> This is the main fallacy in your statement. You are assuming > that a billion PI address blocks has to equate to a billion > routes in some global routing table (or even that there has to > *be* a global table). That would be the case only if we insist > on remaining with a full-knowledge centralized routing model. Assuming? Hello? This exactly what PI is. If there is no central routing it's not PI anymore. PI is what we have _today_. > Such models are outdated. We can do better. Why don't you write something about it? The entire world is waiting for it. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
