Fred, > Fred L. Templin > Your statements seem to be focused on the solutions we have > at hand today along with the unspoken assumptions we have > held as truths in the past. I used to think that carefully > managed hierarchical routing was the only way to go to > achieve scalability, but I am no longer wed to that > assumption.
Can you explain the reasons of the divorce? What new stuff do you have on the front of making PI scalable? Exclude map-and-encap, 8+8, GSE and MHAP as these are not PI solutions. > I don't think anyone is "gambling" on new and different solutions Unless you have some realistically deployable answers to the question, calling for PI now is a gamble that we will find a way to clean it or leave behind a mess 10 times bigger than the v4 swamp. > but I do believe we should keep the door open to them. Closing the door to straight PI is not an option anyway, as straight PI is the last resort if everything else fails. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
