"C. M. Heard" wrote: ... > Synopsis: I question the appropriateness of using the DSCP field > to represent routing policy, and I recommend replacing the > inetCidrRouteDscp object with a more generic inetCidrRoutePolicy > object.
Personally, I agree. This possible usage of the DSCP is too speculative to bless it in a MIB. Writing as diffserv co-chair, your blind copy to the diffserv list was filtered as possible spam, but I have released from limbo so we should see if there is any reaction from that community. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
