On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > >>>>> C M Heard writes: > > [...] > > Mike> 1.) Appropriateness of using DSCP (differentiated services code > Mike> point) as a forwarding table index. > > I raised my voice several times that the indexing is not flexible > enough to represent existing frowarding data structures but I got > strong push back since we only do "minimal changes" - even if boxes > have to cheat in order to implement this MIB...
I saw that when I went through the archived e-mail. Do you think that having an OCTET STRING-based policy selector (in addition to destination prefix/prefix length and next hop) as I suggested can provide the required flexibility? As far as I can see it does, although it might not be the most convenient way. //cmh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
