Margaret Wasserman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This document will replace RFC2374 "An IPv6 Aggregatable Global Unicast > Address Format", which is already a Proposed Standard RFC. RFC2374 will > become historic.
If RFC 2374 will become historic, should draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt be revised a bit so that it no longer refers to RFC 2374? Or is it already too late? -- Heikki Vatiainen * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tampere University of Technology * Tampere, Finland -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
