Heikki Vatiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If RFC 2374 will become historic, should > draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt be revised a bit so that it no > longer refers to RFC 2374? Or is it already too late?
I don't see the reference to 2374 as being a significant problem. Specifically, part of the IESG feedback on addr-arch was to be clear that the reference to 2374 was one possible example, and not normative or The Definitive Example. The only reference to 2374 in the revised document is: Examples of global unicast addresses that start with binary 000 are the IPv6 address with embedded IPv4 addresses described in section 2.5.5 and the IPv6 address containing encoded NSAP addresses specified in [NSAP]. An example of global addresses starting with a binary value other than 000 (and therefore having a 64-bit interface ID field) can be found in [AGGR]. This is quite different than 2374, which has a much stronger reference. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
