On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > I suppose 125-bit LPM will significantly slow down acceptance of ipv6. > > > > I suppose that v6 will benefit from administrative steps setting > > limits on LPM, at least for transitional period. > > I'd agree, that is why the /64 boundary is so important. Glad to hear it. I would say that 61-bit LPM while doable is pretty steep for software still. Can we have say allocation policy for transition limiting it to lower number ? > > Brian > Thanks, Aelksey -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
