On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Michel Py wrote: > > Pekka Savola wrote: > > My perception is that the /48 "border" is inside the IANA > > delegation. > > It is, but read the text again: > > | An example of the resulting format of global unicast address > ^^^^^^^ > > This example is what the Best Current Practice is today. "Current" means > what it means: it might change later, but as of today it's the deal. I > still think this should be published as BCP. Several people have > contributed that we needed to send a "strong message".
The main purpose of this document is to move *RFC2374* to Historic (and at the same thime, explain the reasons for doing so). Advocation is a separate issue entirely. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
