>>>>> On 15 Mar 2003 16:24:00 +0200,
>>>>> Mika Liljeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > For example, this mechanism would not work properly when a local
>> > caching resolver is used. In this common configuration, ...
>> >
>> >What exactly do you mean by "a local caching resolver"? Do you mean,
>> >e.g. a BIND DNS caching server running on the same node of the
>> >resolver? If so, I don't think this is a so common
>> >configuration.
>>
>> I'll have to ask whoever sent me the text :-). I think it was
>> Rob Austein.
> It's not so unheard of to run a local copy of BIND for caching.
(I corrected a typo in my original message.)
I know, and I myself run a BIND caching server on my laptop, but my
point is that "not so unheard" does not mean "common configuration".
>> Do you set a default zone ID for each scope? So, there would be a
>> default link and a default site?
> I can't comment on the KAME implementation, but in general you can just
> specify a default interface and read the default zone IDs for each scope
> level from the scope table of that interface.
Hmm, perhaps I was not clear in the reply to Margaret (I should have
read the entire thread before replying to the first one...). We
actually implemented this way; we support the ability to specify the
"default interface."
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
