John, > The earlier drafts used different language to try to capture > these conditional requirements. The WG did not like the > terms (Unconditionally Mandatory, > Conditionally Mandatory and Unconditionally Optional), so we > dropped them. There seemed to be comments that we should > stick to minimum / basic requirements and things which are > IPv6 specific.
Don't disagree with the WG. I a saying we need multiple node requirements documents. - Node Reqs 3GPP services - Node Database Services - Node Requirements iSCSI/IP Etc Etc. The scope is to narrow currently. Regards, /jim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
