Pekka, And one could do all this by using the current specs.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:26 AM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 5.2 DNS [Re: Nodes Requirements Input] > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Bound, Jim wrote: > > - Node Reqs 3GPP services > > - Node Database Services > > - Node Requirements iSCSI/IP > > > > Etc Etc. > > > > The scope is to narrow currently. > > One would think that one could exercise own judgment and > listen to the > customers (if applicable) when deciding which features to > implement on top > of the minimal set recommended by node requirements. > > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
